Parallel programming is hard. By extension so are MPI and other methods to express parallelism. Is that news? No.
Should the biologist* use MPI? If they want to, but probably not a good idea. Are there alternatives? Of course, and it depends on what you want to do. Should we be developing other parallel programming languages and methods? Yes, people are. Does one size fit all? No. Is Exascale and MPI a big deal? To the extent that it is providing a platform to learn new things about computing and nature, Yes. To the extent that most people need Exascale performance, No. Should I mention Hadoop, Big Data, and Cloud because it they currently have a positive slope on marketing charts? No. -- Doug *any domain expert who does not have a programming/HPC background. > Curious as to what the body of thought is here on this article: > > http://www.dursi.ca/hpc-is-dying-and-mpi-is-killing-it/ > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > > -- > Mailscanner: Clean > -- Doug -- Mailscanner: Clean _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
