My 2 cents. For CFD: From math point of view: hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian formulation, hybrid numerical + analytic models, automatic differentiation, interval arithmetic for sensitive analysis, machine learning (artificial intelligence).
For HPC (that includes CFD): From sw implementation point of view: asynchronous computation, symbolic computation, fault tolerant, DSLs, dynamic and hierarchical data structures. For HPC: From hw point of view: non coherent SOC (others called it relaxed coherency), transaction based. The network holds the data, or the processing happens in the network (eg. like packet inspection/enrichment). Very much in the same way as air is held in the pipes for pneumatic infrastructures. Joshua ------ Original Message ------ Received: 09:45 AM PDT, 06/10/2014 From: John Hearns <hear...@googlemail.com> To: Beowulf Mailing List <beowulf@beowulf.org> Subject: [Beowulf] The computing Crunch for CFD at Exascale > We have a subscription to Aviation Week and Space Technology at McLaren, > which I read at cofee break. Who knows when our rivals might launch a > missile strike on us, or send a heat seeking missile up out exhausts? Best > be ready I say. > > I found this very perceptive article on CFD algorithms and how things will > have to change for exascale. Well digested, and well worth a read. > > http://aviationweek.com/commercial-aviation/nasa-urged-step-research-cfd-capabilities > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
