On 30 January 2014 16:33, Prentice Bisbal <prentice.bis...@rutgers.edu> wrote: > Beowulfers, > > I was talking to a colleague the other day about cluster architecture and > big data, and this colleague was thinking that it would be good to have two > separate FDR IB clusters within a single cluster: one for message-passing, > and the other purely for data movement. I'm a bit skeptical of this myself. > I was always under the impression that IB has more than enough bandwidth for > message-passing and I/O. I have some questions about this idea: > > 1. Does this make sense?
The only project that I have been involved in where we thought about this kind of architecture was for Quantum Chromo Dynamics. If your application is heavily interconnect and IO bound then there might be some value in it however these kinds of applications are somewhat rare. ConnectX 3 has excellent QoS which would probably be a more cost-effective way of engineering it. What is your application? _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
