On 29 November 2013 16:13, Kevin Van Workum <vanw+beow...@sabalcore.com> wrote:
This reminds me of an idea I had years ago to start two new scientific journals. One called, "The Journal of Reproducible Research" and it's evil brother, "The Journal of Irreproducible Research". The Journal of Irreproducible Results is here http://www.jir.com/ Both you and Joe make a good point. I read an article recently which reported that a large proportion of research papers have never been reproduced - since it is not really furthering the career, or upping the count of high impact papers for a researcher to simply reproduce someone elses paper. However reproducibility is at the heart of he scientific method. This might have been the article, not sure. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/28/us-science-cancer-idUSBRE82R12P20120328
_______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
