-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 14/01/13 19:20, Stu Midgley wrote:
> As you might guess, we were very happy with how our codes run on > the Phi and the time/effort required to port. It is very very > simple to use and the performance is excellent :) With no tuning > (just recompile) we saw a single phi go at about 1.7x faster than > our current AMD 64 cores nodes. Is that running natively on the MIC only, or using the compiler/MKL offload capabilities and thus the host CPU & RAM as well? cheers, Chris - -- Christopher Samuel Senior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545 http://www.vlsci.org.au/ http://twitter.com/vlsci -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlD0wnIACgkQO2KABBYQAh+oSgCfUe5JXPM9C/wnkgyCFII8WULc V5IAn0fHbBQjLwrsAPHreTvyY74sjrku =f64k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
