On Oct 11, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Lux, Jim (337C) wrote: > A good example of specialized computing would be the work that DE > Shaw is doing. They're building specialized ASICs (or FPGA > programs) tailored for their chemistry applications, to get > multiple order of magnitude improvement over general purpose > solutions. Clearly they think it's worthwhile: it's a high risk, > high reward sort of industry
Well it's a good example of what HPC is - taking a look into the future by spending some money on number crunching hardware. With FPGA's they probably see further into the future than equivalent priced supercomputers can.Note that you need quite capable hardware engineers with respect to FPGA's and especially with respect to memory controllers, in order to beat nowadays GPU's, but that's undoubtfully what they do. When having a good fpga design and i talked for prices of mass producing it, in itself printing a 1000 fpga chips is just 50 dollar a piece. Then add $100 for each pci-card and some for SRAM on card, depending upon how much SRAM you want. So in itself to crunch with fpga is cheaper than equivalent GPU's, provided you've got a capable network as probably the bandwidth required is going to be huge in case of internode communication. Of course the costs of the team and development cost of the capable FPGA is in the many millions of dollars a year. Kind Regards, Vincent > > Jim Lux > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:beowulf- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Hahn > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:38 PM > To: Beowulf Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Beowulf] K Computer built for speed, not use > >> Any general purpose system will inevitably underperform for some >> people, and many might argue that the art of managing such a >> project is >> making sure everyone squawks equally loud about how the stake is >> being >> driven into their heart. > > I think of it from the other direction: a specialized machine would > need to demonstrate really significant savings. an astrophysics > machine might actually use many times fewer transistors than a > commodity processors (as one of Makino's slides shows), but could > it do anything else? perhaps some forms of MD. but making > transistors work harder is, today, not necessarily a winning > strategy, since managing heat is probably the dominant concern. > > if a domain somehow looks like it's on the verge of a breakthrough, > and specialized hardware is going to give a 100x advantage, well, > that sounds pretty good. if a dedicated cosmology box is going to > bring only a 3x speedup and still be 1e6 away from resolving > important processes, well, I say "get in line for a general-purpose > account"... > > though this argument also hinges somewhat on the expectation of > demand being bursty _across_ domains. > > regards, mark hahn. > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin > Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) > visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin > Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
