> > if someone persisted in stealing cycles, we'd lock their account.
>
> Exactly.  Or visit them with a sucker rod.  Or have a department chair
> have a "talk" with them.
> 
> Human to human interactions and controls work better than installing
> complex tools or automated constraints.
  
I can't, of course, even contemplate the possibility of disagreeing with 
RGB. Having said that, we (humans) do install complex tools and automated 
constraints on each and every technologically advanced piece of equipment, 
from cars and aircrafts, to computing machines (and we do not assume that 
proper training and human interaction suffices to guarantee proper 
operation of the said equipment). In this respect, methods like allocating 
(in a controlled manner) exclusive rights to compute nodes do appear 
sensible. I agree that installing restraints is a balancing act between 
crippling creativity (and making power users mad) and avoiding equipment 
misuse, but clearly, there are limits in the freedom of use (for example, 
you wouldn't add all cluster users to your sudo list).
          
My twocents,
Nicholas  


-- 


          Dr Nicholas M. Glykos, Department of Molecular Biology
     and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, University Campus,
  Dragana, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece, Tel/Fax (office) +302551030620,
    Ext.77620, Tel (lab) +302551030615, http://utopia.duth.gr/~glykos/

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to