> > if someone persisted in stealing cycles, we'd lock their account. > > Exactly. Or visit them with a sucker rod. Or have a department chair > have a "talk" with them. > > Human to human interactions and controls work better than installing > complex tools or automated constraints. I can't, of course, even contemplate the possibility of disagreeing with RGB. Having said that, we (humans) do install complex tools and automated constraints on each and every technologically advanced piece of equipment, from cars and aircrafts, to computing machines (and we do not assume that proper training and human interaction suffices to guarantee proper operation of the said equipment). In this respect, methods like allocating (in a controlled manner) exclusive rights to compute nodes do appear sensible. I agree that installing restraints is a balancing act between crippling creativity (and making power users mad) and avoiding equipment misuse, but clearly, there are limits in the freedom of use (for example, you wouldn't add all cluster users to your sudo list). My twocents, Nicholas
-- Dr Nicholas M. Glykos, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, University Campus, Dragana, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece, Tel/Fax (office) +302551030620, Ext.77620, Tel (lab) +302551030615, http://utopia.duth.gr/~glykos/ _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf