On 07/23/11 12:53 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:05:11AM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: > >> Additional advantage of zfs is that it can deal with the higher >> error rate of consumer or nearline SATA disks (though it can do >> nothing against enterprise disk's higher resistance to vibration), >> and also with silent bit rot with periodic scrubbing (you can >> make Linux RAID scrub, but you can't make it checksum). > And you can have a single zfs filesystem over 100s of nodes with > petabytes of data? This thread has had a lot of mixing of single-node > filesystems with cluster filesystems, it leads to a lot of confusion. zfs + lustre would do that, but the OP was comparing against Linux filesystem + RAID.
_______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
