On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:22 PM, David Mathog <mat...@caltech.edu> wrote: > Mark Hahn wrote: > >>> Thanks! One question, how does EKOPath differ from >>> the AMD Open64 version? > >>I'm sure the answer is "history", since they are at least in abstract, >>both forks that have been separately developed for years. > > > More useful than the history would be a performance comparison of the > current versions of the Open64 variants vs. gcc vs. Intel vs. Portland > compilers. Anybody seen a comparison that is not several years old?
Please don't be mistaken EKOPath != Open64 as already mentioned. (In some cases the difference could be huge or small.. all depends on how much our code has diverged) The EKOPath nightly is available to download if anyone wants to pull and run benchmarks. More important to us is real customer code though. _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
