On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:52:55AM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote: > IMO, this is a dubious assertion. I bought a couple incredibly cheap > desktop disks for home use a couple weeks ago: just seagate 7200.12's.
Are you happy with the 7200.12 so far? I must admit the awful 7200.11 (the 1 and 1.5 TByte variety) has quite soured me on Seagate. I haven't had any problems with WD so far (I'm strictly using RE3 and RE4's, though). > these are of the latest 500G/platter generation, so have the high density > and thus bandwidth: > http://www.sharcnet.ca/~hahn/7200.12.png > > sure, your application may require low-latency. but bandwidth is easy. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
