Mark Hahn <h...@mcmaster.ca> wrote, > > Probably AMD had been thinking hard on this and decided to make compilers at > > last. http://developer.amd.com/cpu/open64/pages/default.aspx > > interesting. it wasn't obvious at a glance how this actually > differed from gcc. besides a comparison on real code, it would > be interesting to know the reason (political, practical?) > what keeps open64 from simply contributing to mainstream gcc. > is there some conflicting infrastructure?
I don't see anything on there to indicate that it is in any way faster than regular gcc. Never mind real code, not even standard benchmarks. Or any comparisons to the commercial compilers, including Intel's. If somebody has a link to it, this sort of info is good to have. Thanks, David Mathog mat...@caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
