On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 05:43:02PM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote: >> Probably AMD had been thinking hard on this and decided to make compilers at >> last. http://developer.amd.com/cpu/open64/pages/default.aspx > > interesting. it wasn't obvious at a glance how this actually differed > from gcc. besides a comparison on real code, it would > be interesting to know the reason (political, practical?) > what keeps open64 from simply contributing to mainstream gcc. > is there some conflicting infrastructure?
All of the infrastructure is very different. There are also phiosophical differences. Kinda like Linux vs *BSD, except the license is compatible. -- greg _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
