----- "David Mathog" <mat...@caltech.edu> wrote: > Thankfully I don't have to do this myself, not having data anywhere > near that size to cope with, but it seems to me that backing up a > nearly full 16TB RAID is likely to be a painful, expensive, exercise.
Well if it's growing slowly to that level, as opposed to just appearing as one big lump, then you're probably going to be OK as long as you've got a robot and the software to run it. The restore, on the other hand, is another kettle of fish.. We found that with XFS that the limiting factor was its less than stellar file creation, and our users have *lots* of small files (and lots of old software builds that they've forgotten about, grr). What took almost a week to restore onto our IBM system (XFS with an internal journal) took about 24 hours onto our new system where we spec'd the server box to have a pair of SAS drives (HW mirrored) to take external journals. Very happy with that decision.. cheers! Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
