Alan Louis Scheinine <alschein...@tuffmail.us> writes: >> I See that ScientificLinux has a huge community using it - at least in >> Europe. Some big research institutes are using it (CERN for example) > etc. etc. > > Sites analyzing LHC data must use Scientific Linux because the associated > applications install themselves on a specific version (or range of versions) > of Scientific Linux.
Not really true. We're the largest European tier-1 site for ATLAS, and we run on a number of different distributions - various versions of CentOS, RHEL, Fedora, Ubuntu... I think there's even some Scientific Linux boxes lurking somewhere. It's not the actual scientific applications that restrict your choice of distribution, it's the grid middleware stacks. We run ARC, which is very portable. The other European tier-1:s run gLite, which is tightly integrated to the base OS, and *then* your freedom of choice is much smaller. Still, you can pick (at least) any of {SL, CentOS, RHEL} 4, they are all basically the same thing. -- Leif Nixon - Systems expert ------------------------------------------------------------ National Supercomputer Centre - Linkoping University ------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf