Greg, Greg Lindahl wrote:
that in practice using multiple VLs will suffer from significant negative effects due to implementation details. Does anyone know of a proof point of this?
In practice, the per-port amount of buffering in the switch crossbars is not big enough for multiple VLs (buffer == die space == $$$). So, if you configure multiple VLs, you divide the buffer and you cannot reach line rate in any single VL. You can cheat a bit by not supporting long cable, but it only goes so far. Oh, and buffer size requirement grows with the link bandwidth, because speed of light is constant.
This is different from per-priority flow-control, because the buffering can be done at the end, where it's cheaper.
QoS in the switches has always been a giant hoax, starting from the ATM days. Beyond admission control, the only thing you can reliably do is decide what to drop first :-)
Patrick _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
