On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 at 1:20pm, Greg Lindahl wrote
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 03:21:55PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
In theory, it's a great idea. In practice, wiring up an entire 2nd
network gets to be a major PITA (as well as being uncheap) as your
cluster size increases. I've got ~350 nodes here, and a 2nd set of
cabling is really, really low on the list of projects I'd like to tackle.
I can name a bunch of 350 node clusters that have multiple networks.
So, obviously, YMMV.
Those are probably at schools which actually *have* undergrads. *sigh* I
need flunkies...
In all seriousness, if management and/or file traffic were slowing down
*work*, then I'd absolutely go for a 2nd network. But ours is a mixed use
cluster running primarily EP serial jobs. As you said, mileage varies.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin
UCSF
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
