Lux, James P wrote:
>
>
>
>
>     But how is that any different than having a PC on your desk?
>
>     I see the deskside supercomputer as a revisiting of the
>     "workstation" class computer. Used to be that PCs and Apples were
>     what sat on most peoples desks, but some had Apollo or Sun or Perq
>     workstations, because they had applications that needed the
>     computational horsepower (or, more likely, the high res hardware
>     graphics support.. A CGA was pretty painful for doing PC board
>     layout).
>
>     Same sort of thing for having the old Tektronix 4014 graphics
>     terminal, rather than hiking down to the computer center to pick
>     up your flatbed plotter output.
>
>     Jim
>

Jim,

One big difference is that this machine will be sold to department chairs and 
Deans not as a desktop or high end workstation but as a cheap "Supercomputer" 
that needs no support. The PC support available in an organization may be 
completely unable to deal with the realities of HPC.


--> then the seller is lying about no support required, and the buyer deserves 
what they get.  The real question is whether the box is more like a "super 
desktop PC" or a "supercomputer".. The former, by design, should have a fairly 
low admin overhead (i.e. the hardware configuration is fixed and stable, the OS 
ditto, relatively few applications on it).. The latter has a high SA overhead, 
because, by it's nature, it's used by a heterogenous group of folks running 
heterogenous applications which were all developed to stretch the limits. It's 
whether the new deskside box exhibits "the realities of HPC", or it's just a 
faster computer like the other ones.

That's when I get an urgent call about a machine that I don't know about. The 
clock started ticking the day that the machine arrived and that's the 
impossible timetable to which I will be held. In other words, even with my 
absolute full attention my efforts will be presented as failing to set up the 
machine in a timely manner. In addition all of the other researchers who have 
invested in the centralized resources will complain that they are not getting 
the attention that they need.

--> That's more of an education and management of expectations.

I think that there are times that machines such as this on a departmental or 
even researcher level make sense even in an organization that provides central 
resources. But those times are the exceptions. I have 2.5 System Admins. I have 
~300 machines in two different locations as standalone servers and parts of 
clusters.

---> then you're grossly underfunded and/or your institution is getting a great 
deal because you and your staff is making a herculean effort.  Typical support 
costs in industry run about $200-300/month per desktop (and that's for fairly 
vanilla installations).. 300*300 = $90K/mo = $1080K/yr -> 4-6 people.


 We can get by with this level of staffing through standardization of hardware 
and operating systems (currently 90% linux, 9% Solaris, 1% IRIX), security 
standards that lock down unused ports and services, and careful testing of 
software (physical sciences, math, OR, bioinformatics) before it is made 
generally available. With budget cuts looming on the horizon, adding support 
for new department level systems without additional staffing would leave us 
unable to continue to provide adequate support for the central systems. IMHO. 
YMMV.


-->> exactly.. Your operation is on the ragged edge of resources, so your 
organization really can't tolerate dropping in a new and different sort of box, 
at least within the desktop PC support model. But for an organization that 
already has, say, 10K machines, and the staff corresponding to the $30-40M/yr 
budget (e.g. a hundred people), adding a new flavor of box isn't as disruptive. 
 One of the horde can be detailed off to become the "new widget expert".

--> So perhaps your institution isn't really the appropriate target market 
(yet).. I don't see this as particularly different than any other new 
technology introduction.  When mainframes first entered the halls of academe, 
I'm sure the same sort of discussions arose.  Heck, it's why computers like the 
PDP-8 were invented.

Jim

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to