Ivan Oleynik wrote:
Maurice,
Valuable information, thanks very much!
My pleasure.
If you wanted it stacked that way (performance order), then this
is more closely aligned (ascending):
..
Notice how the performance ramp is pretty close to identical to
the price ramp?
That is not accidental.
This is what I need to test using my codes.
That is the thing. No matter what anyone says, your codes are all that
really count.
Good luck with it.
BTW< where a lot of people are jumping on the "Get IPMI " bandwagon, I
suggest getting PDUs with remote IP controlled ports is more useful.
More reliable, anyway.
I have seen too many cases where IPMI jams up.
If you set your machines BIOS to start on power up, it is trivial to
stop and start machines with the PD U power, and that is definitely
reliable.
Plus , with a lot of those PDUs you can add thermal sensors and trigger
power off on high temperature conditions.
--
With our best regards,
//Maurice W. Hilarius Telephone: 01-780-456-9771/
/Hard Data Ltd. FAX: 01-780-456-9772/
/11060 - 166 Avenue email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
/Edmonton, AB, Canada http://www.harddata.com//
/ T5X 1Y3/
/
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
