Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 at 9:34am, Tim Cutts wrote >> On 2 Jul 2008, at 4:22 pm, Prentice Bisbal wrote: > >>> B. Red Hat has done such a good job of spreading FUD about the other >>> Linux distros, management has a cow if you tell them you're installing >>> something other than RH. > > Erm, do you have any examples of that? All I see is RH a) trying to > sell their product (nothing wrong with that) and b) in general, being a > pretty good member of the OSS community.
You say tomato, I say, uhhh, tomato. > >> Fedora did not exist, and I'm still not sure how separate from Red Hat >> Fedora and CentOS really are, but that's probably just my ignorance. >> The fact that > > CentOS is in no way officially associated with Red Hat. At all. They > use the freely available RHEL SRPMs to build the distribution, and they > report bugs upstream when they find them. But that's it. True, but CentOS is irrefutably tied to RH. If RHEL disappears, so will CentOS, -- Prentice _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
