Is someone using a signed int to represent the 1 KB blocks?
2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 = 2199023255552

yes - you can see from the message that the kernel is trying
to use a 16-byte read-capacity command, but it's failing.
these days, scsi and especially fc and super-especially some obscure driver like this are less heavily scrutinized, so this is not hugely surprising. I don't know whether the error status indicates a flaw in the driver or perhaps in the target (which might not support large luns).

We ran into a problem with large disks which I suspect is fairly common,

in my world, large == sata raid, and scsi/fc is a vanishing breed,
which also coincides with the stunted size of scsi/fc disks.
that said, the only scsi my organization has (embedded in HP SFS clusters)
is (annoyingly) chopped up into piddly little 2TB luns.

however the usual solutions are not working. IBM, RedHat have not been able to provide any useful answers so I am turning to this list for help. (Emulex is still helping, but I am not sure how far they can go without access to the hardware)

I think you should ask them whether the driver supports the 16-byte read-capacity. and you should ask the target provider (hitachi) whether
they support >2TB luns and whether they implement 16-byte commands.

you paid through the nose for FC hardware; you should expect a high level
of service.





Details:

* Linux Cluster for Weather modelling

* IBM Bladecenter blades and an IBM x3655 Opteron head node FC attached to a Hitachi Tagmastore SAN storage, Emulex LightPulse FC HBA, PCI-Express, Dual port

* RHEL 4update5, x86_64 kernel 2.6.9-55 SMP and RHEL provided Emulex driver (lpfc) and lpfcdfc also installed

* GPT partition created with parted

There is one 2TB LUN, works fine.

There is a 3TB LUN on the Hitachi SAN which is reported as "only" 2199GB ( 2.1TB) ,

We noticed that, when the emulex driver loads, the following error message is reported:

           Emulex LightPulse Fibre Channel SCSI driver 8.0.16.32
           Copyright(c) 2003-2007 Emulex.  All rights reserved.
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:2d:00.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 185
           PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:2d:00.0 to 64
lpfc 0000:2d:00.0: 0:1305 Link Down Event x2 received Data: x2 x4 x1000 lpfc 0000:2d:00.0: 0:1305 Link Down Event x2 received Data: x2 x4 x1000 lpfc 0000:2d:00.0: 0:1303 Link Up Event x3 received Data: x3 x1 x10 x0 scsi5 : IBM 42C2071 4Gb 2-Port PCIe FC HBA for System x on PCI bus 2d device 00 irq 185 port 0
           Vendor: HITACHI   Model: OPEN-V*3          Rev: 5007
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
           sdb : very big device. try to use READ CAPACITY(16).
           sdb : READ CAPACITY(16) failed.
           sdb : status=1, message=00, host=0, driver=08
           sdb : use 0xffffffff as device size
           SCSI device sdb: 4294967296 512-byte hdwr sectors (2199023 MB)
           SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back
           sdb : very big device. try to use READ CAPACITY(16).
           sdb : READ CAPACITY(16) failed.
           sdb : status=1, message=00, host=0, driver=08
           sdb : use 0xffffffff as device size
           SCSI device sdb: 4294967296 512-byte hdwr sectors (2199023 MB)
           SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back

The problem is with the READ CAPACITY(16) failed, but we are unable to find the source of this error.

We conducted several experiments without success:

- Tried compiling the latest driver from Emulex (8.0.16.32) - same error
- Tried Knoppix (2.6.19) and Gentoo LiveCD (2.6.19 ) , and CentOS 4.4 - same error - Tried to boot Belenix (Solaris 32 bit live), failed to boot completely (may be unrelated issue)

We have a temporary workaround in place: We created 3x1TB disks and used LVM to create a striped 3TB volume with ext3 FS. This works fine.

RedHat claims ext3 and RHEL4 supports disks upto 8TB and 16TB respectively (since RHEL4u2)

I would like to know if anyone on the list has any pointers that can help us solve the issue.

Regards
Anand Vaidya



_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

--
operator may differ from spokesperson.              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to