Douglas Eadline wrote:
I believe that if we do not protect against revisionist history, then
[...]
you mean like how now with WCCS2k+3 clustering and HPC is *now*
(suddenly magically spontaneously) "mainstream" ?
This is just something I personally take issue with. The entire
explosive growth of clustering has driven HPC hard into the mainstream.
This happened long before it was a glimmer in their eyes. 6+ years of
explosive growth, going from noise in the statistics to dominating the
statistics. Then along they came with WCCS2k+3.
Their entry is late into the cycle. And if you listen to the comments
of the senior execs, it makes one wonder how committed they are to HPC
and clusters as compared to how committed they are to battling Linux.
This is not to diminish their efforts. WCCS2k+3 is likely reasonably
good for some subset of groups. Microsoft has some good people there,
and playing with the W2k+3 x64 on our JackRabbit unit was fun. They
still need a real POSIX subsystem, and hopefully, someday, they will
give in, and get cygwin or mingw to be fully supported/shipping using
their compilers/tools.
Though I expect to see airborn and stable flight from porcine critters
about the same time. Too bad, as that would likely ease
adoption/porting issues. Tremendously.
--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics LLC,
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 786 8423
fax : +1 734 786 8452 or +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
