VERY INTERESTING!!!

We had a similar episode with an IBM Shark (I believe) machine. It said that two drives failed simultaneously,. The first time required a complete rebuild. The second (in 3 months) got IBM's attention. The problem was with the controller. We wound up needing to replace the controller and then discovered that neither drive was actually bad.

Ooops.




Chris Samuel wrote:
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 5:54 am, Mike Davis wrote:



We've had good luck with Apple's arrays.


</lurk>

So have we.

On the other hand we've had an IBM FAStT & EXP enclosure (or whatever they're called today) which lost 2 SCSI drives (one in the main unit and one in the EXP) within a minute, both in the same RAID-5 array.

Fortunately we coaxed one of them back into life long enough for the array to rebuild onto the hot spare, swapped the dead one out, failed the other suspect drive, rebuilt and replaced that one.

Turned out they were both manufactured on the same day..

<lurk>


_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to