numbers. It seems that the fortran version of the program with pathscale 2.3 (the numbers I reported above) reports different numbers than the C version of the program with pathscale 2.3:

my numbers were from a random stream binary I had around,
so I don't really even remember which compiler for sure
(probably pathscale 2.2.1, may well have been C rather than fortran).

recompiling with a fresh copy of the source gives me 9.4 GB/s
on my dual-socket single-core opteron 2.6 cluster, and 8.8
or so on the aforementioned 2x2 (275).
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to