[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: <snip> > Sure. This is for one specific CFD code. Let's assum that MPICH 1 is the > basline. > MPICH2 was twice as fast (half the run time). LAM was 30% faster than MPICH2. > Scali MPI Connect was 20% faster than LAM. Altogether, Scali MPI Connect > was twice as fast as MPICH1. > > Is this what you were looking for? > > Jeff >
Yes, thanks. How well did LAM scale beyond 2^4 nodes compared to the others? -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs Go to the Chinese Restaurant, Order the Special _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
