From: "Jim Lux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll just be waiting for the .NET Framework 2.x "cluster computing
namespace" with all the message passing primitives.
Oh such primitives will undoubtfully get casted onto the tcp/ip library
using
the swapfile.
Actually before they have something like that it's helpful when windows
first takes care that allocating shared memory doesn't work via the swapfile
swapfile, but takes care that you can allocate REAL fast RAM that can be
SHARED between processes and removes another obvious bug.
Basically if your system has 2 GB ram, with 1GB for swapfile
and you try to start 4 processes, each process allocates and manages itself
a shared memory block of 400MB, and attaching to the 3 other 400MB blocks,
then that's gonna fail.
Reason: the OS calculates that 4 * 1.6GB = 6.4GB and that's bigger than 2GB
ram = 1 GB swap,
so it can not possible attach all segments to each other as your system
doesn't have 6.4GB according
to windows.
Besides, reading and writing to those shared memory blocks is extremely slow
regurarly,
like a factor 1000 slower than it should be, for whatever reason (perhaps a
bad memory manager?).
Nowadays you can't enforce windows to physically put that shared memory in
RAM with
VirtualLock() function, which worked so great for NT 4.0 / windows2000 and
no longer works
for XP, so that sucks too.
Note that microsoft can't say they do not know about this problem.
They simply won't solve it.
Windows is not so perfect for very well scaling applications that use quite
some RAM too.
Note that multithreading using some RAM and 8 cores is not easy under
windows either.
Basically hits a similar problem within windows.
Vincent
----- Original Message -----
To: "SIM DOG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <beowulf@beowulf.org>
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] MS HPC... Oh dear...
At 06:20 PM 6/11/2006, SIM DOG wrote:
G'day all
Sorry if this turns out to be a dupe post but MS has just released their
HPC clustering kit.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/ccs/overview.mspx
While I've tried to approach this with an open mind... it didn't last
long. I'll refer anyone to ClusterMonkey's article about why Linux is a
better platform for clustering.
Maybe the equiv MS site should be called ClusterMoney? =)
We had an interesting discussion about MS's clustering ideas a few months
back on the list (Nov 2005).
Being the big boy on the block, MS has to have a presence everywhere, if
only to support some decision maker who's running down the list of check
boxes (Hmm.. Security, Check. Shared Drives, Check. Database server,
Check. Cluster computing, Check.). Doesn't have to work as well as other
solutions, just has to exist.
And, if you have an ALL Microsoft shop, AND you have tasks that
Microsoft's solution works for, then why not use it. Who knows, someone
might come up with clever stuff to use their implementation in an
effective way.
Whatever you do, don't read this article as the level of marketing-speak
and Ra Ra may well impede synapses firing...
Such articles are fairly common in the weekly trade rags.. While I haven't
actually seen one, I wouldn't be surprised to see something like:
Gizmotron Widgets today announced the model 1303 entertainment adjunct,
based on Gizmotron's patented "side to side orbital motion" swing ( US
Patent 6368227 ). Fred Harris, Gizmotron's CTO, announced that by using
their recent proprietary research methods into the principle that moving
objects tend to remain in motion and stationary ones require a force to
start moving, they have developed a new twist on an age-old children's
pastime. Seeking their first round of funding, Bob Smith, CEO, said "We're
really excited about this, and as soon as we work out the legal issues
surrounding swinging rights management for our content providers, we'll be
licensing our technology to several top-tier manufacturers."
James Lux, P.E.
Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group
Flight Communications Systems Section
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213
4800 Oak Grove Drive
Pasadena CA 91109
tel: (818)354-2075
fax: (818)393-6875
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
