Hi Sean, On Thu, 11 May 2006, Sean Dilda wrote: > >10.0.0.16/28 goes through eth1 > >the rest 10.0.0.0/24 can go through eth0 (as before) > Instead of trying to put certain nodes on eth0 and certain nodes on eth1, > have you considered bonding eth0 and > eth1 together and letting traffic be spread across them like that? It should > automatically balance traffic for > you. Please please please correct me if I am wrong but I thought that bonding is done between targets, ie all the nodes has to have bonded interfaces to take advantage of bonding?
or I can just bond 2 interfaces on the server and leave the rest of the
nodes connected with 1 interface to the switch?
I have trunking (which is I believe is the same as bonding) option
in my DGS-1248T... may be I should RTFM for the beast...
Sure if I can bond only servers interfaces together and switch splits
bonded traffic appropriate between the targets, I should not bother with
all that mess I was describing...
> Plus, if an ethernet port or cable does on the storage server when the ports
> are bonded, all your nodes can
> still get to NFS.
I am not sure what you were trying to say ;-) may be "s/does/fails/"?
--
.-.
=------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------=
Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User ^^-^^ [175555]
pgphM5TtbY4fH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
