Hi, Zhigang, May your platform also get failed cases when run OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat* although no crash, because I have only Baytail T platfrom. I am not sure the other platform has the same issue. If yes, I could try to investigate the reason. It may have issue of filter2D OpenCL implementation in OpenCV. Thanks.
Yan Wang > Hi, All, > I found one possible bug for review. > if run the following: > ./opencv_test_imgproc --gtest_filter=OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat*. > OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 failed and continue. But the whole test > flow will crash in OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257: > [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/240, where GetParam() = (CV_8U, > Channels(2), 7, 1, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (6433 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 (358 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 (311 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 (6 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 (203 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 (207 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 (203 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 (7 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 (210 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 (207 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 (208 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 (7 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 (214 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 (207 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 (212 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 (7 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 > /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:106: > Failure > Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst, udst)) <= (threshold), actual: 255 > vs 1 > Size: [92 x 61] > > /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:107: > Failure > Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst_roi, udst_roi)) <= (threshold), > actual: 255 vs 1 > Size: [92 x 61] > > [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256, where GetParam() = (CV_8U, > Channels(2), 7, 4, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (7413 ms) > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 > opencv_test_imgproc: /home/yanwang/beignet/src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c:703: > intel_gpgpu_check_binded_buf_address: Assertion > `gpgpu->binded_buf[i]->offset != 0' failed. > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > But if I run OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 only, it passed. I think 256 > case may influence it. > Thanks. > > Yan Wang > _______________________________________________ Beignet mailing list Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
