Wiggins d'Anconia wrote:
>sub test1 {
> my $aa = 1;
> my $aaa = 2;
> test2($aa, $aaa);
>}
>
>sub test2 {
> my ($bb, $bbb) = @_;
> print "aa = $bb\n";
> print "aaa = $bbb\n";
>}
>
>Is the above better, in the court of readability and encapsulation,
>yes, in the court of elegance, maybe not...
Elegance in programming should be defined in terms of readability, at least partly.
Very dense ways of coding a certain goal are smart (and I admit that I like to
compress my code as much as possible), but not necessarily very elegant. ;)
- Jan
--
There's no place like ~/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>