dont forget to remove jumper that bypasses RTS pin and grounds/raises it
for sending/receiving only. can't remember the order

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:46 AM Rnd Mpt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> With RS485-modbus-converters the timing of the RTS pin is CRUCIAL.
> Software toggling (GPIO toggling) of this pin (in the RS485/libmodbus
> library someone added this capability) have shown (on oscilloscope) to not
> be repeatable or works 1 in 30 attempts.
> I think we used the stock standard
> bone-debian-8.7-lxqt-4gb-armhf-2017-03-19-4gb.img and the RS485 branch of
> libmodbus library.
> And hardware toggling of RTS pin with dedicated RTS pin.
>
> I think if you check the stock standard image name i provided it will
> answer your questions: I believe OMAP is not loaded from some version
> onwards
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:39 PM Jeff Andich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> A couple of things you may want to investigate before you use the OMAP
>> driver vs. the 8250:
>>
>>
>> 1) According to an older Wiki from TI, the OMAP serial driver doesn't use
>> DMA in serial transfer, but 8250 does.  Not sure if this is still the case??
>>
>>
>> http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Sitara_Linux_UART_-_Switching_to_8250_Driver#Overview
>>
>>
>> 2) For this experiment, we coupled an unrelated GPIO signal (for the RTS
>> signal) with a given UART through the device tree and found that Python can
>> only toggle the RTS line when connected to an OMAP driver as opposed to
>> 8250 driver.  Note: We didn't try picking a pinmux/IOSET which already has
>> an RTS/CTS signal defined for a given UART.  The 8250 driver might allow
>> that use case to work.... Will let you know what we find out..
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 5:19:25 PM UTC-6, Jeff Andich wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm fairly confident the answer to my question about whether the  8250
>>> driver implements "partial 485 capability", (allowing Python or a C#/.net
>>> application to manually control the RTS line for a given UART via the
>>> driver) is NO.  But the OMAP driver DOES appear to allow this.
>>>
>>> When I toggle the serial driver defines in kernel 4.4.y's defconfig file
>>> ( see below),  re-build the kernel, and deploy to my target (along with the
>>> device tree which couples a given GPIO on my custom board to UART5)  I'm
>>> only able to toggle the RTS line from within Python (to enable/disable the
>>> 485 chip's transmit)  when I open the /dev/ttyO4 device in Python, but not
>>> with the /dev/ttyS4 device.
>>>
>>> Additionally, the device tree containing the fragment below appears to
>>> be successfully coupling gpio5_8 and UART5, so this appears to be a driver
>>> issue rather than a device tree user error issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> I built the RCN 4.4.y kernel both ways:
>>>
>>> In paches/defconfig:
>>>
>>> (1) {CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_OMAP=n,  CONFIG_SERIAL_OMAP=y}
>>> (2) {CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_OMAP=y,  CONFIG_SERIAL_OMAP=n}
>>>
>>> *** Also worth noting is I lost my serial console until I enabled,
>>> CONFIG_SERIAL_OMAP_CONSOLE=y ***
>>>
>>> Ironically enough, my current build (built using configuration (1)
>>> above) appears to have BOTH the OMAP and 8250 devices which isn't what I
>>> would expect.. I've only tried writing to /dev/ttyO4 at this point.  There
>>> maybe some other defines which need to be changed in the defconfig to
>>> switch off the 8250, named serial device files in the /dev/ directory.
>>> Film at 11 on that one..
>>>
>>>
>>> ******************
>>> Listing of serial devices with kernel 4.4.y built with configuration (1)
>>> ******************
>>>
>>> debian@BeagleBoard-X15:~$ ls -l /dev/ttyO*
>>> crw-rw---- 1 root   dialout 248, 0 Nov 16 19:28 /dev/ttyO0
>>> crw------- 1 debian tty     248, 2 Nov 16 19:28 /dev/ttyO2
>>> crw-rw---- 1 root   dialout 248, 4 Nov 16 19:28 /dev/ttyO4
>>> crw-rw---- 1 root   dialout 248, 7 Nov 16 19:28 /dev/ttyO7
>>>
>>> debian@BeagleBoard-X15:~$ ls -l /dev/ttyS*
>>> crw-rw---- 1 root dialout 4, 64 Nov 16 19:28 /dev/ttyS0
>>> crw-rw---- 1 root dialout 4, 65 Nov 16 19:28 /dev/ttyS1
>>> crw-rw---- 1 root dialout 4, 66 Nov 16 19:28 /dev/ttyS2
>>> crw-rw---- 1 root dialout 4, 67 Nov 16 19:28 /dev/ttyS3
>>> crw-rw---- 1 root dialout 4, 68 Nov 16 19:28 /dev/ttyS4
>>> crw-rw---- 1 root dialout 4, 69 Nov 16 19:28 /dev/ttyS5
>>>
>>>
>>> *****************
>>> Python snippet and brief description of test results
>>> *****************
>>> ser = serial.Serial('/devlttyO4')
>>> ser.ctsrts = False
>>> ser.write(b'I wish the BeagleBone folks would produce a pocket Beagle
>>> with an am5728')
>>>
>>> I see Tx data from my 2 wire 485 chip on the scope.
>>>
>>> ser.ctsrts = True
>>> I see nothing from my 2 wire 485 chip on the scope.
>>>
>>>
>>> ***************
>>> Build Configuration
>>> ***************
>>> Started from the console build for BB-X15 with debian 8.9 on elinux
>>> Robert referred me to a few weeks ago.
>>> Followed the instructions on eewiki for rebuilding BB-X15 kernel, but
>>> checked out branch origin/4.4.y, and built kernel using build_kernel.sh.
>>>
>>> debian@BeagleBoard-X15:~$ uname -r
>>> 4.4.83-ti-r119
>>> debian@BeagleBoard-X15:~$ cat /etc/dogtag
>>> BeagleBoard.org Debian Image 2017-10-02
>>> debian@BeagleBoard-X15:~$
>>>
>>> Regards and thanks!
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 6:44:22 PM UTC-6, Jeff Andich wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Will the 8250 driver still allow "manual" control of the RTS line for a
>>>> given UART from an application like Python or C# (where the application
>>>> toggles the state of the RTS line, rather than driver, after sending a
>>>> request message in order to toggle the 485 XCVR), or is the OMAP driver (in
>>>> place of the 8250 driver) needed for this as well?
>>>>
>>>> I've attempted to associate the RTS line for UART5 with GPIO5_8 (which
>>>> is connected to the DE toggle on a 485 chip) via the device tree (kernel
>>>> 4.4.y), followed by calling setRTS(True/False) from Python, but that
>>>> doesn't appear to be switching the 485 XCVR.  However, I can still use
>>>> sysfs commands to toggle the GPIO5_8 connected to the 485 chip to control
>>>> the direction of transmission.
>>>>
>>>> In order to help differentiate between an incorrect device tree
>>>> configuration vs. needing to recompile the kernel with the OMAP  driver
>>>> instead of the 8250 driver, I'm wondering if you know whether the 8250
>>>> driver will support what we're trying here. Everything I've read (including
>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/beagleboard/nMtRpdWSJu0/EDSXqGpiBAAJ)
>>>> seems to suggest that the 8250 doesn't yet handle toggling the RTS/CTS
>>>> lines on its own based on delays between characters, but I haven't seen
>>>> anything about manual control.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Following is a snippet/fragment from my device tree. ***LATE
>>>> DISCLOSURE*** From UART5_8, you can see that this is for the BB-X15, but I
>>>> believe the same issue pertains to both the BBB and the BB-X15:
>>>>
>>>> &uart5 {
>>>>         pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>>         pinctrl-0 = <&uart5_pins>;
>>>>         status = "okay";
>>>>         rts-gpio = <&gpio5 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>>>         rs485-rts-active-high;
>>>>         rs485-rts-delay = <0 0>;
>>>>         linux,rs485-enabled-at-boot-time;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!!!
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 3:04:51 PM UTC-6, Rnd Mpt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We used the rs485 version/branch of the modbus on github. Sorry i
>>>>> meant to say rts instead of cts.
>>>>>
>>>>> I used my github as notes. Follow readmes and see if it helps. Its
>>>>> been a while since we did this. Let me know if more help is needed
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/rwdutoit/beaglebone?files=1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, 16:33 , <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/RobertCNelson/bb-kernel/issues/38
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017. november 10., péntek 20:33:49 UTC+1 időpontban
>>>>>> [email protected] a következőt írta:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did you ever get this to work
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am using the Nelson yakbuild kernel 4.9.45 and disabled the 8250
>>>>>>> and enabled omap serial in kernel configuration
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> using same rs485 dtso overkay I can not get RTS to work
>>>>>>> and nothing transmits.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can not find anything on web to solve this.
>>>>>>> Do you have a solution procedure?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dennis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
>>>>>> the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/JGIm0Ej6jDI/unsubscribe
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/702f3cd1-c887-4003-9993-aa70998a5b1a%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/702f3cd1-c887-4003-9993-aa70998a5b1a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/JGIm0Ej6jDI/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/0112ef50-5fae-4e13-844f-01866d28ea1a%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/0112ef50-5fae-4e13-844f-01866d28ea1a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CANPM5qWz%2BzJVfnQmzktiGUZ%2BbD5WH-2xY9PnK8hPst8DXuvpWQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to