spend 50 bux on a power supply to solve a 5 dollar problem  yeah right.

On 5/16/2016 12:34 PM, John Syne wrote:
>
>> On May 15, 2016, at 4:25 PM, evilwulfie <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> msp430 has an internal watchdog
> And so does the AM3358, so I’m not sure whats your point? If it is a
> micro-controller, it is not guaranteed to boot up successfully every
> time, given an unstable power supply. To start with, you need to make
> the power supply more predictable so that brown outs, dips and sags
> are not seen by the micro-controller and that power down only occurs
> if the input power fails for more than a specified time. Also, if you
> do start a shutdown, then a full power cycle is needed in a controlled
> manner. When input power returns, don’t boot until the input power
> looks reliable. 
>
> This is where you need an understanding of how the power utility
> network operates, which includes understanding how protection
> operates, what an ARC (Automatic Reclosure Relays) do, etc. For
> example, when a large breaker trips due to a protective signal, the
> ARC will attempt to reclose that breaker, sometimes more than once. At
> night, in a storm, you will see your lights dim for a second or two;
> that is an ARC operation. When a transformer has water in the oil or
> when a insulator is arching, or a power line is arching on the ground,
> these all result in very strange power behavior. In summary, power
> failure isn’t just an on or off problem, but a multitude of more
> problematic cases. 
>
> Regards,
> John
>>
>> On 5/15/2016 3:37 PM, John Syne wrote:
>>>
>>>> On May 15, 2016, at 3:14 PM, evilwulfie <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We use an external msp430 for our intelligent watchdog
>>> So who or what monitors the MSP430? Since it is a micro-controller,
>>> it is easy to get it into a lock situation. All you need is a
>>> programable power supply which will ramp up and down the voltage
>>> into the micro-controller at predefined times and it will lock and
>>> become completely unresponsive. Granted this will rarely happen, but
>>> in our applications where 100K or more devices are installed, we
>>> cannot accept some devices locking up because of a power failure. 
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/15/2016 1:07 PM, Super Twang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just come across this conversation in my own search for a
>>>>> rock-solid, embeddable configuration for the BeagleBone Black.
>>>>>  I’m trying to develop an embedded controller device that needs to
>>>>> live behind walls, in ceilings and in other inaccessible places. (
>>>>> It is for the automation of art & other electronic installations.)
>>>>>
>>>>> From what I gather here, the BBB is not quite up to the task,
>>>>> without an external watchdog circuit (please correct me if I’m
>>>>> misreading this thread).
>>>>>
>>>>> @John3909: Your suggestion of the GreenPak prompted my own
>>>>> discovery of that tech — it looks great, esp the ecosystem of
>>>>> tools around the platform. 
>>>>>
>>>>> In looking around, I found some Silego application notes that
>>>>> implement a hardware watchdog for MCUs.
>>>>>  http://www.silego.com/products/352/312/AN-1058.html  This might
>>>>> be a useful starting point for anyone using GreenPak for a
>>>>> hardware watchdog.
>>>>>
>>>>> @John3909: Does this design look like it might be a good fit for
>>>>> the BBB? (Not knowing how to read GreenPak internals, it is not
>>>>> obvious to me)
>>>>>
>>>>> Alternately, I'm wondering in the two years that have passed since
>>>>> this thread started, if anyone has developed a hardware watchdog
>>>>> design for the BBB they'd be willing to share.  An open-source
>>>>> hardware watchdog for the BBB would go a long way towards
>>>>> ameliorating the hardware issues with the PMIC on RevC, and allow
>>>>> it to prosper as a base for applications where long-term
>>>>> reliability matters.
>>>>>
>>>>> Although I’m first and foremost a software engineer, I've got some
>>>>> electronics chops (albeit mostly digital), but (sadly) very
>>>>> limited hardware design equipment (oscilloscope, etc).  [That
>>>>> said, I have iron, and will solder!]  I’d be happy to develop &
>>>>> contribute the software components for such a system (I’d envision
>>>>> a library + device tree overlay) if someone(s) else would like to
>>>>> partner up to design the hardware side.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> ST
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>> send an email to [email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/c7fb39d8-84ef-4127-9db8-cd65a6965e31%40googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>> send an email to [email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/976bd440-2729-5157-8692-3357a8d607a0%40gmail.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> send an email to [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/E00049D5-E39B-42CB-8A5E-A19F4E51199F%40gmail.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send an email to [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/300489a5-a027-8f30-a598-89be5b17b4a4%40gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/300489a5-a027-8f30-a598-89be5b17b4a4%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> -- 
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/7BFABDDC-D4D0-4E6F-863C-1015E9794658%40gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/7BFABDDC-D4D0-4E6F-863C-1015E9794658%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/4b8c4f6e-abae-446c-d964-26d37b92d4b3%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to