Well, I could have been a smart ass and told you I found that link via
google . . . "how to linux kernel development". But I was noticing the
direction of a couple posts including mine. Sadly, my original post is for
the most part truthful. But perhaps Linux developers are not lazy ( some
surely are ), but like to teach "tough love" xyx by example ( or something
). To be honest though, I can completely sympathize with these people. As
I've been asked some fairly idiotic questions myself, and it really gets
old . . . that and I'm not exactly a guru.

I know how you feel though. I started off last year with my own A5A knowing
NOTHING about embedded Linux, or Linux development. But like you I have had
many years experience with C. Also been using Debian since the mid 90's,
which has helped me a lot, once I broke the rust off.

Some helpful advice for the future. I can no speak for everyone, but
personally I prefer short concise questions. You give me a wall of text,
and I'm just as lilkely to delete the email, as read it. *shrug*


On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:58 PM, A P <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you William that is exactly what I was looking for. I am sorry we
> seam to have got of to a bad start here. I guess I interpreted your initial
> reply differently than you intended.
>
> You are correct I have a fair amount of experience at C and CAN/serial
> comms stuff however I am new to Linux - especially the build process etc. I
> am happy with big projects generally.There are a few areas I was struggling
> with to do with builds and compilers etc and I guess more than one issue at
> once sometimes looks like a massive issue.
>
>
> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 4:34:43 PM UTC+1, William Hermans wrote:
>
>> A_P, So, I don't really know what you're asking. It almost sounds as
>> though you're experiencing what I refer to as "pre project anxiety" Meaning
>> you've taken on a project larger than you're normally used to, and you do
>> not know where to begin. Normally what I do in this situation, I just start
>> writing code. Then when I start running into potential problems. I'll break
>> out the "whiteboard", and work out the program flow.
>>
>> Do you know of this ? https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/HOWTO.
>> Also, git is much more than a tool to upload / download source files. You
>> can use it to create patches, you can use it to search your entire project
>> for various "things", etc. Then I'm sure there is much more to it. See, I'm
>> still learning git myself . . .
>>
>> Anyways, the only way you're going to learn is by doing. So just do, and
>> start learning. You're very likely to make mistakes along the way( just
>> like any one else ). SO long as you learn by them, there really is no
>> problem.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Don deJuan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  On 08/07/2014 05:15 AM, A P wrote:
>>>
>>> William,like I said every search I do is not helping - and I do alot of
>>> searching, and I can get the project out of git hub.
>>>
>>>  I think you misunderstand, I appreciate how important GitHub is and
>>> more importantly the effort people put in to create the code. If I didn't I
>>> wouldn't be referencing it. I had already managed to get the project out
>>> etc. The issue I have is the large jump from code to building a kernel with
>>> modification, ensuring it is built  with the correct components etc and
>>> ensuring that every subsequent C project I write can pick up and use the
>>> new library.. I think you have perhaps forgotten how long it takes to learn
>>> or you did it incrementally. There is alot of it and it is very daunting -
>>> wonder how many people have been put off by the scale or the attitude.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, August 5, 2014 4:27:29 PM UTC+1, William Hermans wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   *The problem is every search I do on the subject assumes I know how
>>>>> to use github and how to compile the parts of the kernel I need and what I
>>>>> do with the output. There is no step by step guide - this does not make it
>>>>> easy for people that are new to Linux. *
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Get used to it, this is the way it will always be. For some reason,
>>>> Linux users seem to be incredibly lazy, or really bad at communicating
>>>> instructions. Sure, not all the time, just most of the time. I suggest that
>>>> you make a Debian VM, and start learning . . . Also while you're at it, you
>>>> *DO* need to learn git. git is far more useful than you  seem to realize.
>>>> Start using goolge, and go to town.
>>>>
>>>>  Remember, *you* are the one who needs to learn these things. So it is
>>>> your own responsibility to learn / figure out various things. It will get
>>>> easier / better with time and experience.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:22 AM, A P <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  I am trying to work out how to build an install an update to the
>>>>> kernel for the CAN. The project I believe is here
>>>>>
>>>>>  https://gitorious.org/linux-can/
>>>>>
>>>>>  There are a few sub projects within it. I specifically want to add
>>>>> the ISO-TP protocol to my beaglebone project so I guess this means 
>>>>> building
>>>>> it into the kernel - I don't believe this is a released part of the
>>>>> SocketCAN driver as standard yet. I am using Debian as my OS.
>>>>>
>>>>>  The problem is every search I do on the subject assumes I know how
>>>>> to use github and how to compile the parts of the kernel I need and what I
>>>>> do with the output. There is no step by step guide - this does not make it
>>>>> easy for people that are new to Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Also I guess if I add functionality to the kernel I would need to
>>>>> update header files etc to use these features.
>>>>>
>>>>>  If I use a cross compiler on a windows pc (or a linux pc for that
>>>>> matter) do I need to build drivers/libraries there as well ?
>>>>>
>>>>>  Thanks in advance to anyone that can explain
>>>>>
>>>>>  A_P
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   --
>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   --
>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>> Only "attitude" I see in this thread is yours. You got solid advice for
>>> being a n00b to the world YOU wanted to join. No one will hold your hand
>>> through your entire process and ever single step for your specific desires.
>>> There is plenty of info out there how to any and every step. Especially at
>>> the level you're looking for, ie beginners stuff.
>>>
>>> --
>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to