I have some experience with 3g dongles on the beaglebone and they are very
very unreliable. I've tried different models and they all suck. Also they
are powerhungry, about 300 - 600 mAh at 5v. Depending on the state they are
in idle or high power
On May 15, 2014 8:45 PM, "Maxim Podbereznyy" <[email protected]> wrote:

> As long as you keep adding unnecessary stuff to this thing it gets less
> time for fun (flying) because 3G or other dongles consume at lot of
> current. They are just designed to be fed by a wall outlet
> 15 Май 2014 г. 3:09 пользователь "Jason Kridner" <[email protected]>
> написал:
>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, May 12, 2014 8:11:10 PM UTC-4, Mike McDonald wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> A group of Rose-Hulman students have been hard at work this past year
>>> building a Beaglebone Quadcopter with these goals in mind:
>>>
>>> 1. Low cost ($100-150 w/o Beaglebone)
>>> 2. Fully open source (Cape, Frame, and all control software) on our
>>> Github<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FRose-Hulman-ROBO4xx%2F1314-BeagleBone-Quadcopter%2Ftree%2Fmaster_rev2&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNEY9jAF2bWpjDA3Btkrd2JbBb35Ng>
>>> .
>>> 3. Easy to assembly and repair (we estimate it will take 1-2 hours to
>>> assemble and get ready to fly)
>>> 4. Durable and easy to fly (currently supports USB game controller
>>> control, though we initially tested using a USB RC controller, though it's
>>> also possible to eventually use a cell phone as a controller) with a 10
>>> minute flight time
>>> 5. Sensor packed: 9-Axis (MPU 9150), Altimeter (BMP 180), Ultrasonic
>>> Rangefinder (HC SR04), Battery Gas Gauge (MAX 17044), and CMOS Camera
>>> (OV7670).
>>>
>>> The Quadcopter is flown via WiFi and Bluetooth (though streaming video
>>> doesn't yet work over Bluetooth) from a host computer (you need somewhere
>>> to view the streaming video from). Additionally, we're using a Debian image
>>> and have added Xenomai for better real time performance. We're also using
>>> both PRU's: one for real time motor control and one for the camera. With
>>> the quadcopter software running, we've still got 80+% of the CPU free for
>>> other processing (OpenCV, etc.).
>>>
>>> We're currently using a PID control scheme, but we may be switching to a
>>> sweet state variable feedback system (or getting a senior design group next
>>> year to do it).
>>>
>>> So, we want some feedback from you guys on the following:
>>>
>>>    1.
>>> *Would you buy one of these Quadcopters? *
>>>
>>> Absolutely!
>>
>>>
>>>    1.
>>>    2.
>>> *Is our price point reasonable? Is this something worth selling
>>>    ourselves or would this be a good kickstarter project? *
>>>
>>> $100 is reasonable. $150 is kinda pushing the limit a bit for me. Looks
>> great for experimenting and I think it'd be a good kickstarter. Hopefully
>> you build up some good community interest here first and discover the
>> killer feature for which everyone needs this. :-)
>>
>>>
>>>    1.
>>>    2. *Are there any other features you think are critical (wouldn't
>>>    buy without it)?*
>>>
>>> Having the camera is awesome. I might want an optional GPS and/or 3G
>> modem. Can I add one myself? I don't think it is required in the bundle.
>>
>>
>>> If you want to dive deeper into our design:
>>>
>>>    1. *How does the software look (particularly the PRU to C
>>>    interface)? Would you be willing to maintain it, or update it to State
>>>    Variable?*
>>>
>>> Looks like the main routine is control_alg. Personally, I kinda like the
>> structure of libpruio from what I've seen so far, where there is a C
>> library interface provided. I also like the messaging approach of Matt
>> Ranostay's PRU lighting code. Do you have any code documentation that would
>> make it easier to review? I don't think many people are going to dive into
>> your code until they know what problems it solves and how modular it is
>> such that they feel they could start using parts of it.
>>
>> Looks like you have a lot running on the PRU. Do you have a summary?
>>
>>>
>>>    1. *How does the PCB look? Are there any flaws you see? Would you
>>>    want to add or remove any other sensors?*
>>>
>>> Layout seems pretty simple and clean. Is
>> https://github.com/Rose-Hulman-ROBO4xx/1314-BeagleBone-Quadcopter/blob/master_rev2/noncode/Board/Quad32brd.pngthe
>>  latest?  All of the versions are a bit confusing for me.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>    1. *How does the mechanical design (Quadcopter frame) look? Is it
>>>    aesthetically pleasing? Easy to build (if you have a laser cutter, give 
>>> it
>>>    a try and let us know)? Easy to fix when broken?*
>>>
>>> I have access to a laser cutter at my hackerspace, but I've never used
>> it. Do you have simple pictures of the pieces or any hints on where I could
>> order some pre-cut pieces like with Shapeways?
>>
>>
>>> Here are some pictures:
>>>
>>> <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-kgxIfN6_fL8/U3Ffs2ZPgsI/AAAAAAAAAFM/u8omMlHOvHY/s1600/2013-12-18_14-34-02_876.jpg>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-TKaZ6oB1_uA/U3Ff9Si5xcI/AAAAAAAAAFc/nr2p7Wztm-M/s1600/2013-12-18_14-34-24_871.jpg>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-fhFlpxYzDIk/U3FgD43LFvI/AAAAAAAAAFk/Tag00rk5ww4/s1600/2014-03-30_14-06-29_481.jpg>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-xhMc-hNYpT8/U3FgKukzMYI/AAAAAAAAAFs/T-Sd2HiQB9M/s1600/2014-03-30_14-06-37_787.jpg>
>>>
>>> Videos are available on here
>>> <https://www.dropbox.com/sh/0pfk43b3zq14rjh/xk6Kl6lccb#/>(and on the
>>> github<https://github.com/Rose-Hulman-ROBO4xx/1314-BeagleBone-Quadcopter/tree/master_rev2>).
>>> Our best video is probably 
>>> here<https://www.dropbox.com/sh/0pfk43b3zq14rjh/xk6Kl6lccb#lh:null-Video%20May%2011%2C%206%2004%2014%20PM.mov>,
>>> as it shows it both flying as well as the streaming video.
>>>
>>> If you guys have any questions, respond here or email me back.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>  --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/TkwaB8a9NIk/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to