Look, I should have 32-bit data generated with a frequency f =100kHz. Which means a data throughput of 3.2Mb/s. With SPI I should have the possibility to work with a data throughput of 48Mb/s (which is more than 10 times faster). I already know your question: "But in the previous post you said that you needed GPMC for high data throughput...but it seems to be not...why?" Because I will probably will asked to manage an higher data throughput in a couple of years, so I decided to save time now...
But right now it seems that SPI is the best compromise between performance and realization-time. Thanks a lot for your effort. Regards. Alberto Il giorno venerdì 11 ottobre 2013 14:26:36 UTC+2, Gerald ha scritto: > > Is that going to be fast enough for your application? > > Gerald > > > > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
