Ah, ok. That's a lot for the input Erik! --WP
On 12/31/07, Erik Bengtson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been using BCEL for several years. It's certainly not buggy and the > API > is very simple. BCEL source code is also very easy to understand, so you > can > easily create patches. > > However there is not a lot of activity in the project to support newer > java > spec versions. I've tried up to JDK 1.5 features and BCEL works pretty > well. > > ASM is a good alternative if you need a faster byte code manipulation > tool. > > -----Message d'origine----- > De: uprime uprime812 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé: lundi 31 décembre 2007 14:19 > À: BCEL Users List > Objet: is BCEL a good choice? > > Hello again, > > I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code > modification capability. I > need a byte code engineering library with features like: > > * offer a reasonable set of utilities > * not buggy > * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly > * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting > enterpreneur > :) > > Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions? > > Thanks, > > W.P. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
