Hello,
The Pool used shouldn't matter, provided that it is the same Job.
Can I check that you have one Job (per client) with different level Pools
defined:
e.g.
Job {
Name = BackupForClientX
Client = client-x
Schedule = WeeklyCycle
Full Backup Pool = NameOfFullPool
Incremental Backup Pool = NameOfIncrPool
Differential Backup Pool = NameOfDiffPool
...
...
}
and also a schedule that defines the job Level:
e.g.
Schedule {
Name = WeeklyCycle
Run = Level=Full 1st sun at 01:00
Run = Level=Differential 2nd-5th sun at 01:00
Run = Level=Incremental mon-sat at 01:00
}
There's a very good example of using pools for different levels of backup
in the "Automated Disk Backup" section of the manual:
https://www.bacula.org/11.0.x-manuals/en/main/Automated_Disk_Backup.html#SECTION0031300000000000000000
Thanks.
--
Graham
On Tue, 31 May 2022, egoitz--- via Bacula-users wrote:
Hi mates,
One little question. I have been doing some checks this afternoon. I have a
full pool, a differential one, incremental one, month-archival-pool and
year-archival-pool. If I do a full backup in the pool full obviously it ends
up fine. I can even restore from it. But if I wanted to do now, a
differential backup it sais me :
No prior or suitable Full backup found in catalog. Doing FULL backup.
But the fact is the backup exists!, but in the full pool obviously not in
the differential pool.
I have done all this checks in very few minutes (perhaps a couple, three), I
was wondering if perhaps Bacula 11 needs some time for noting that a full
backup exists in another pool of the catalog. Or else, could you know, why
could it that be happening?. Until now, I have just worked with a pool, and
have never had this issue... but it's time to make better things :) :) and
Bacula sais that... perhaps it needs some time?.
Cheers!!
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
