On 2017-01-10 03:49, Timo Neuvonen wrote: > What confused me is that the example conf files supplied with current Bacula > releases don't give an example of the very basic disk-based setup, but just > show how to setup a virtual disk autochanger. > The whitepapers that Kern referred gave me an impression that the virtual > autochanger setup is primarily for high-end applications where may be > thousands of concurrent jobs, and where it is essential to have a more > precise control on how concurrent jobs simultaneously use several volumes. > I hope I got this right?
I haven't looked at example files in quite some time so I wasn't sure. Personally I have hard time figuring out what practical problem would be solved by having 2 "storages" writing to the same directory -- maybe if you want to run backups and restores at the same time all the time... I use an SSD spool and it's despooling pretty much as fast as the spinning rust will take it. I expect adding a concurrent writer would only add contention and slow it all down. YMMV and all that of course. Dima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
