On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Dan Langille <[email protected]> wrote: > Andreas Schuldei wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:48 PM, John Drescher <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I would just enable concurrency. Use a small spool file (less than 10 >>> GB) and let several machines run their backups simultaneously. > > It is easier to follow the conversation if you reply inline.
yes, sorry, gmail does not make it easy for people. my normal mua does. >> that is a solution for now since we backup to disk. i did read >> http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Basic_Volume_Management.html and >> understood nothing, though. the text is not very well written. > > We are always looking for people to submit improvements. is there a clearer description somewhere? > I'm also thinking: you could backup to local disk with high concurrency, > then migrate/copy the job to tape later. For this, Bacula 3.x would be > better I think. that sounds very good. where do i find info on how to do that? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
