>> not acceptable at 2MB/s. i cannot find any real difference in the network
>> config or nfs mount
>> config on these filesystms. i suspect it has to do with the nature of the
>> filesystems. masspec
>> has less than a millon files, aspen has around 8 million files and birch has
>> nearly 17 million.
>>
>> has anyone had similar experience working with nfs backups of this nature?
>> anything i can do
>> to improve performance to get the filer backed up in a reasonable time
>> window?
>
> With the purpose of gathering facts: are these results repeatable?
>
In the same way of idea that Dan.
This could be have to do with the database server having to much record to
store.
What and where are the db server ?
How is the load on it, did you use the delay-insert feature (if so where the
tmp file is created ? )
--
Bruno Friedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ioda-Net Sàrl - www.ioda-net.ch
2830 Vellerat - Switzerland
Tél : ++41 32 435 7171
Fax : ++41 32 435 7172
gsm : ++41 78 802 6760
C'est Facile et Cool d'Évoluer en ligne : www.cfcel.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
