-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dan Langille wrote:
> On 15 Aug 2007 at 15:27, Michael Nelson wrote:
>
>> Hmmmm.
>>
>> I got 2.2 installed here from source, and was expecting to see the big
>> performance gains I had heard about. Strangely, at least in my
>> application, 2.2 seems to be /significantly slower/ than 2.02.
>
> Did you specify --enable-batch-insert on your configuration? I found
> that in ReleaseNotes.
- From what I read, batch inserts should be enabled by default. I didn't
specifically enable them on my system and configure tells me:
Batch insert enabled: yes
Of course, the performance gains that you get from batch inserts are not
noticeable if you previously didn't have the database inserts as a
bottleneck. (ie if your DB previously didn't have a problem keeping up
with the inserts, this won't do much apart from maybe lowering the
overall load on your system.)
Greetings,
Michel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFGxE8t2Vs+MkscAyURAmvaAKCEkyleX907tL41feJy/5J/O2Q2lACdEUyy
MF09azv8JlVe2EwqRGK7cuY=
=5JRN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
