-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Drescher wrote:
> On 3/2/07, Stéphane Lardier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> hi,
>> is it possible (and does have sense) to run concurrent jobs on a tape ?
>> no risks of corruption of datas ?
>> thanks for your tips
>>
>
> No this works very well.
Wasn't there a difference between 'Concurrent with spooling' and 'really
concurrent as in interlaced'? I seem to recall something as if the
latter wasn't tested/recommended but I may have missed that getting
changed. (So far I'm only aware that concurrency through spooling works
well and is thoroughly tested.)
Greetings,
Michel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFF6EPD2Vs+MkscAyURApNOAJ94Snc4gpHXi50XSHgGe6U+f38JDwCgqKlC
KXTB0WaUcytsJwREi4SD7qo=
=xLSY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
