Very Interesting. The docs show /var/run/bacula as one of the directories that must me manually created prior to installing. What is interesting to me is you had a working system prior to an in-place upgrade. Still think it's a bug?
Erich On Jan 8, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Gavin Conway wrote: > Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected. > Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade). > > The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon > refused to start until I'd created a /var/run/bacula directory. > > Either I've missed a step or this is a bug with the make install > process. > > Cheers, > Gavin > -- > > UKS Ltd, Birmingham Road, Studley, Warwickshire, B80 7BG > Tel: 08700 681 333 - Fax: 01527 851 301 - AS: 20547 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.uksolutions.co.uk > - Please, consider the environment before printing this email - > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php? > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
