On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Kshatriya wrote:
> The best solution would be to clone the files which are stored on disk to
> tape...
Is really nobody using Cloned Pools and Jobs? :-(
My current try is, to make a "Default" pool and a "Clone" pool. The Clone
pool has the type Cloned.
After that I created 2 jobs, a job "Client1" which writes to the default
pool and a job "CloneClient1" which writes to the ClonePool and has an
extra statement:
Run = 'Client1 level=%l since=\'%s\''
Unfortunatly this seems to do nothing. When I start CloneClient1, a backup
goes to the ClonePool, but Client1 job does not run - the jobs just seem
to run independently from each other.
Am I understanding something wrong in this concept, or am I doing
something wrong? If I need to start jobs independently from each other,
then what is the difference to just start 2 regular jobs who write things
concurrently to 2 "regular" backup pools?
Thanks! :-)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users