Dan Langille wrote:
> On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill Moran wrote:
>
>> I haven't had time to investigate whether the [FD|SD|DIR]Address sets
>> both the listening and the outgoing address, but a firewall audit is
>> on the TODO list, and when I finally get to it, I'll have to address
>> this for a number of services, not only Bacula.
>
> My testing today shows that is sets both listening and outgoing. All
> I tested was a status command. Nothing more.
>
>
Well, that doesn't seem to be the case on my linux (FC5) machine. :(
The LISTEN addresses are right but the address the communications spawn
from is the base system address.
tcp 0 0 xxx.xxx.x.49:9101 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 100 9291 3056/bacula-dir
tcp 0 0 xxx.xxx.x.49:9103 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 0 9239 3011/bacula-sd
Then run a status client command with the following ngrep running (I
shouldn't see any data)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bacula]# ngrep "" "src host xxx.xxx.x.48 and dst host
xxx.xxx.x.3"
interface: eth0 (xxx.xxx.x.0/255.255.254.0)
filter: (ip) and ( src host xxx.xxx.x.48 and dst host xxx.xxx.x.3 )
114 received, 0 dropped
And I see the following in netstat:
tcp 0 0 xxx.xxx.x.48:53286 xxx.xxx.x.3:9102
TIME_WAIT 0 0 -
:(
--
James Ray. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Computing Services
Queen Mary, University of London
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
