On Wednesday 17 August 2005 12:38, Martin Simmons wrote:
...
>
> Kern> captures errno. So errno can be destroyed after that point and
> be.strerror() Kern> will continue to produce correct results.
>
> Ah, of course I didn't see that because the code is in the header
> file...lovely C++ :-(.
Well, there are a few nice things about C++, but I try to limit how far I go.
>
>
> Kern> For Win32 that may not
> be strictly Kern> correct as there is no errno, so GetLastError() is used.
> As long as there is Kern> not a second error in between time, there should
> be no problem (at least that Kern> is the theory).
>
> Perhaps it would be better if the Win32 berrno constructor called
> GetLastError() instead of delaying it until strerror?
Yes, I was thinking the same thing. I've taken note, and I'll look at what
can be done ...
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
