On Wednesday 08 August 2007 15:55, Allan Black wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Wednesday 08 August 2007 15:09, Allan Black wrote: > >> Found what I think is a (minor) bug in the find_next_volume code; > >> patch attached. > > > > Could you resend your email with the diff in unified format (diff -u). I > > don't read the format you sent. > > OK, here it is (and I'll bear that in mind in future).
Oh, much clearer. Hmm. "Recycled" is much more logical but as you very cleverly figured out, it doesn't work. I don't know how you found this one, but bravo. Yes, it is a bug, and it may fix a lot of the "weird" complaints that some users have concerning recycled volumes. I've modified the source code, and this will be in version 2.2.0 when it is released (probably this weekend). Best regards, Kern > > Allan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
