mark k wrote: > Agreed sas drives are the way to go, just built a backup server with > 10 300gb sas running in a raid 50, going to hopefully replace 2 backup > servers that were using SATA storage.
This is just a question of price. We are currently running 3 Backup-Servers, which is way cheaper than building one with SAS drives. Peter -- "Wer nichts zu verbergen hat, hat bereits alles verloren" http://klicklich.at ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
