Hi Robin, sorry I missed your message on the first run.
At 19:27 1-1-2002, Robin Berjon shared with all of us: >On Thursday 27 December 2001 17:42, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > > It was the only one that kept my php installation working, and didn't > > require xml files to have execution rights...... > >That sounds strange, why is it that your xml files need to be +x ? Mine >certainly don't need to be. I'm nog using <Files> and that works. In 1.4.84/5/6 I didn't get it working on a directory or location level, through Apache::Registry::Filter, as was suggested by someone on the lest. This required +x on the xml files. > > With all these configuration possibilities, can you maybe provide a > > 'table of context'? Where each directive is mapped to the context it > > may/should/is_preferred to appear in? This would make config-juggling > > a lot easier. > >There is a *very* bare bones document in cvs for the AxKit Docs project >(http://www.sf.net/projects/axkit-docs/) called config-quickref.dkb. It won't >help you in this case as it's pretty much empty, but if someone has the >strength to start adding stuff there it'd be very cool. What karma would be required to do that and where would I get the information to put the information there, other than trial-by-error? Best regards, Melvyn Sopacua WebMaster IDG.nl _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ If it applies, where it applies - this email is a personal contribution and does not reflect the views of my employer IDG.nl. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
