As Michael Holzt wrote: > Sorry for not responding earlier. I'm not lost, but i'm currently > writing my master thesis and only have about one week left but still > a lot to do ...
Oh, I wish you good luck then! It's been quite a while ago since I had to file my diploma thesis. ;-) > As far as i know my serbb patch was fine with a few glitches to fix > up (e.g. i removed to much of the static declarations). So if this > gets fixed, the could could probably go in. I didn't fix them by now, but that can always be done later, as no user-visible problems will arise out of that. I've only been eager to get the serbb code into release 5.0, as it would have been a shame to leave working code out for a feature that is at least occasionally being asked for. Since I knew the patches as sitting in my tree have once proven to work on Linux, FreeBSD and Windows, I just went ahead committing them `as is'. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ avrdude-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev
