Ole Tange <[email protected]> writes:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[email protected]> wrote:

>> I wish automake could warn about leading whitespace damage;
>> unfortunately, the parser would need to be quite a bit smarter
>> for such a warning to work reliably.

> Could it be extended so you could start the line with either <TAB> or
> <DOT><WHITESPACE>? Or would that break too much backwards
> compatability?

It breaks the basic assumption that Makefile.am is basically a makefile.
I suppose that Automake could try to transform the whitespace as part of
its processing, but I'm not sure that's a good idea.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([email protected])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


Reply via email to