[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig) wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:58:46 -0700 (PDT), Ask Bjoern Hansen ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > What should we standardize on looking for? I would think looking > > for either of the two ways to include the license I described above > > would work well. Comments? > >We should adjust the CC list first. Would this be a perl5-porters >topic? What was the original forum? We cpan-testers got into the conversation midway, and I'd like to read about the motivation for this initiative. ------------------- ------------------- Ken Williams Last Bastion of Euclidity [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Math Forum
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Tom Tromey
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Russ Allbery
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Richard Stallman
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Richard Stallman
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Russ Allbery
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Russ Allbery
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Ken Williams
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Graham Barr
